Pentagon Reject Russian Doctrine Russia slapped NATO

Pentagon Reject Russian Doctrine Russia slapped NATO. The US Department of Defense said that there are “challenges” in deterring a threat in Russia's doctrine.

Pentagon Reject Russian Doctrine Russia slapped NATO
Pentagon Reject Russian Doctrine Russia slapped NATO
The US Department of Defense said that there are “challenges” in deterring a nuclear threat in Russia's military doctrine. Thus, according to Pentagon Deputy Head John Oud, the Russian doctrine states that Russia can use nuclear weapons “without fear” against the United States and its partners to meet an “adequate response”. 


  • The US defense the department sees in the military doctrine of Russia the challenges of the concept of nuclear deterrence adopted by Washington. This was stated by the deputy head of the Pentagon and on political issues, John Rood at the annual security forum in the city of Aspen (Colorado), reports TASS.


  • He accused Russia of building up tactical nuclear weapons. The United States, he said, “did not produce new nuclear weapons for decades”, but only improved existing ones. “We are modernizing our means of nuclear deterrence, since these means must be fundamental and effective. We are also studying where the interference is being made, and this system of deterrence is challenged, ”he said.


Rood added that, in the opinion of the American authorities, "such a challenge comes from the Russian doctrine."

“[In the doctrine], in our opinion, it is expressed that they [the Russians] can use small nuclear weapons against the USA and its allies without fear of an adequate response,” the deputy head of the Pentagon believes. In particular, in this way, he explained the need to modernize some American nuclear weapons.

In addition, he argued that the Russian side is violating the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF). 

“We are concerned about the future and are working with other parties to convince the Chinese and Russians that their approaches do not stabilize the situation and do not lead to the security system they want. Where possible, we will cooperate in finding solutions to issues such as the preservation of the START [Treaty on Further Reduction and Restriction of Strategic Offensive Arms, which expires in 2021] and other treaties in the nuclear field. We will have to do it together, ”the Russian agency quotes his words. 
Earlier, the acting head of the US Department of Defense, Mark Esper, expressed this opinion. He said that Russia is actively expanding and modernizing its arsenal, which contains about 2 thousand tactical warheads that can be placed on ships, submarines, aeroplanes and used by ground forces or air defense forces.

At the same time, he assured that the United States and its NATO allies are ready to "effectively repel Russia's aggression." According to him, the United States is waging a war in cyberspace with Russia at the same time, the Russian side, according to Esper, allegedly steals technology from the United States, conducting industrial espionage. 

In addition, the contender for the post of defense minister believes that Russia is a "strategic opponent" of the United States: he is confident that the opposition is already underway in the Arctic zone, Africa and Latin America.

Esper noted that Washington and the country's partners have enough funds to counter the “Russian aggression”. In particular, maintaining the combat capability of nuclear and conventional forces is, in his opinion, the most effective method of deterrence.

“Coordination of our actions with allies in Europe and the very alignment of forces will effectively repel Russia's aggression,” said the acting secretary of defense. 
You may also like:-


From July 17 to July 18, Russian-American negotiations on strategic stability took place in Geneva, during which, in particular, the issue of the impact of new technologies on international security were raised, reports RIA Novosti 

  • “We managed to consider almost the entire agenda of arms control” said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov.


  • So, the Russian side told the American delegation, which was headed by First Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan, about the military doctrine of Russia.


  • “We discussed the impact of new technologies, such as hypersound, on international security and information technologies,” Ryabkov added, stressing that “arms control remains the mainstream.” At the same time, according to him, the American authorities "do not give up control under armaments, including because of their own security."



  • “A realistic, sober, in-depth and professional conversation as the start of what I would like, over time, to call a specific process” said the deputy minister after consulting with the US delegates.

"Russia slapped NATO": Tu-160 flew over the Baltic

Russia scared NATO troops during the NATO BALTOPS-2019 large-scale annual naval exercises when two supersonic strategic Tu-160 missile-carrier bomber flew near manoeuvre sites in international airspace. Experts indicated that in this way Moscow simply reminded the West that it could launch a missile-bombing attack on NATO anywhere in the world. 

Pentagon Reject Russian Doctrine Russia slapped NATO
Pentagon Reject Russian Doctrine Russia slapped NATO


During the major annual naval exercises of NATO BALTOPS-2019, which took place in June in the Baltic Sea, two Russian supersonic strategic bomber-missile carrier Tu-160 frightened military alliances reported the Chinese edition of Sohu.

The authors of the material believe that by directing their aircraft to the place of manoeuvres of the alliance, the Russian side wanted to demonstrate to the member countries of the bloc that it would not allow provocations at its borders, FAN reports.

“The appearance of the strongest Russian Tu-160 bombers scared the NATO countries in earnest,” the article said.

Since Russian bombers were in the international airspace, the NATO countries could not do anything, although Denmark, Sweden and Finland lifted their fighters into the air. But it did not make any impression on the Russian pilots. According to the authors of the Chinese edition, this behaviour has become for the countries of the bloc a “peculiar slap in the face”.

“Moscow simply reminded the West again that it could launch a missile-bombing attack on NATO anywhere in the world.

Tu-160 is the most powerful bombers in the world. And on the weight being lifted, and on the range of flights, and on speed, ”confirmed Mikhail Alexandrov, leading military expert at the Center for Military-Political Studies of MGIMO.

At the beginning of this week, the Korean news agency Yonhap, referring to the committee of the chiefs of staff of the republic’s armed forces reported that the aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces violated South Korea’s airspace in the Sea of ​​Japan twice in the morning.

The incident allegedly occurred in the area of ​​the Dokdo Islands (Takeshima), located east of the southern part of the peninsula. They are the subject of a dispute between Seoul and Tokyo.

According to the KNSH, three military aircraft of the Russian Federation and two - the Chinese Air Force - on the morning of July 23 invaded the South Korean air defence identification zone. According to the agency, one Russian plane violated the airspace of the republic twice: around 09:00 and 09:30 am local time (03:00 and 03:30 Moscow Time, respectively).

It is reported that in response to this, South Korea raised its fighters, Air Force. They fired warning shots, reports NSN.

The agency clarified that this is the first such case of a violation of Korean airspace by the Russian Federation Air Force.

In response, the Russian Ministry of Defense stated that the Russian TU-95MS, while flying over the Sea of ​​Japan, did not violate the borders of other states.

Another incident in the South Korean air defense identification zone occurred in mid-June. Then

the republic also raised military aircraft to intercept Russian strategic bombers Tu-95,

included in this territory.

  • In the middle of this month, the Polish edition of Gazeta Wyborcza wrote that the Swedish island of Gotland is turning from a strategic point into a fortress. According to the author of the article Bartosz Velinsky, if the Russian paratroopers "occupy the island", Moscow "will control the entire Baltic Sea."


  • Gotland is the largest Swedish island in the Baltic. It is located 130 km from the coast of Latvia and 330 km from Kaliningrad.


  • It is of strategic importance: it is from there that you can control the entire Baltic, and in particular the movement of the Russian Baltic Fleet, “if he wanted to start military operations against Poland, Denmark and Germany,” the Polish analyst emphasized.


  • "Therefore, in the scenarios of the USSR aggression, a raid of Russian paratroopers on this island invariably appears and its exclusion from the game with the help of one blow," the article stated.


As the journalist said, during the exercises, Russian aviation "approached the island of Gotland and simulated an attack on Swedish targets." He noted that the Tu-22M strategic bombers carrying nuclear warheads also took part in the manoeuvres.

Velinsky, referring to expert opinion, stated that

Russia allegedly "planned a nuclear strike on Sweden" even before the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, to exclude it from actions on the Baltic Sea.

Earlier this month, the Swedish military announced that they would deploy a renewed air defense system in Gotland because of tensions in the region allegedly created by Russia. According to Reuters, the new system, developed and built by Saab, will replace the mobile anti-aircraft guns in Gotland.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, on the fields of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), said on June 1 that Moscow "is not going to threaten Sweden."

“It seems to me that only a sick person can imagine that Russia suddenly wants to attack Sweden,” said the Russian leader.

Donald Trump Asked ": The Pentagon explained the rusty technique

The Pentagon does not consider rust on armoured vehicles a big problem, the department said on the eve of Independence Day celebrations in Washington. Earlier, several Bradley armoured vehicles and Abrams tanks with peeling paint and rust traces were brought to the US capital. The military said that these machines "asked the White House", and in addition, the tanks were "cleaned before delivery."

“The White House asked for these particular cars. They were cleaned before being brought to the National Alley, ”the Pentagon said in response to the question of why a technician had been chosen for the celebration.


On the evening of July 3, in the centre of the American capital, two armoured support vehicles for the M2 Bradley infantry with peeling paint and rust stains were put on public display. The barrels of automatic guns of 25 mm calibre were removed, the agency noted. According to the FAN, the military closed up the holes from the guns in the tower with scotch tape and covered the optics with cardboard, which was also wrapped in adhesive tape.

In addition, two M1 Abrams tanks, an armoured Humvee jeep and a tracked armoured repair and recovery vehicle (BREM) M88, developed in the mid-1950s, were brought to the exposition.

Independence Day is celebrated in the United States on July 4th - this year, Americans celebrate the 243rd anniversary of the Declaration of Independence from the British Empire.

On the holiday in Washington is expected to address US President Donald Trump. According to media reports, the leader will talk about the military power of the United States - at this moment combat aircraft, helicopters and the presidential "Flight number 1" should fly over the centre of the capital. In addition, the latest US Air Force F-35 Lightning II fighter will take part in the air parade.

It should be noted that the parade of military equipment in the capital of the United States will not be, but its a demonstration will cost the US authorities about $ 1 million. The losses of airlines that are forced to move about 100 flights due to the closure of the Washington airport do not include this amount, CNN reported.
The idea of ​​a parade with armoured vehicles Trump took from his French counterpart - President Emmanuel Macron. In 2017, the American leader attended a military parade in honour of Bastille Day in Paris.


  • The patriotic action in Washington caused discontent among several Ameseveralens. On Independence Day in the capital of the United States will be a protest of the anti-war movement CodePink. However, the city authorities did not agree with the activists to launch into the sky a huge inflatable figure depicting US President Donald Trump as an angry baby in a diaper. 


The flight of “Trump's baby” cannot be carried out without the approval of the US Federal Aviation Administration.

The American president himself promised on July 2, reports NSN, that on Independence Day Washington will be hosting an “incredible air parade and the biggest firework”.

The effectiveness and modernity of the American military equipment was repeatedly challenged by the Pentagon itself, albeit in an indirect form. Russia and China are mastering the “fourth dimension” in the field of armaments and the US is “completely helpless” in front of hypersonic shock systems like Avangard said the former head of the US Northern Command Howard Thompson.

According to him, the United States cannot oppose anything to this weapon and hypersonic systems like the Russian Avangard were created specifically to overcome the American anti-missile defense system.
The harsh reality, Thompson adds, is that the mindset of American strategists does not take into account the capabilities of hypersonic rockets.

The hypersonic weapon of Russia and China is capable of overcoming almost any US missile defense system, the report of the American Court of Auditors stated earlier. “There are no countermeasures,” state officials say. Moscow and Beijing are focused on the development of new weapons, the speed, height and manoeuvrability of which are capable of penetrating most of the missile defense systems. The report notes that hypersonic technology can be used to modernize long-range nuclear missiles.

Russian tanks T-14 "Armata" in comparison with the American "Abrams" also look more advantageous: experts say more powerful and modern weapons, armour and combat layout, as well as manoeuvrability.




Pentagon Reject Russian Doctrine Russia slapped NATO Pentagon Reject Russian Doctrine Russia slapped NATO Reviewed by Write What's you know on July 28, 2019 Rating: 5

1 comment:

Like a Reply

Powered by Blogger.